The Japan Times – Japan, Russia to discuss territorial row

The Japan Times – Japan, Russia to discuss territorial row

The Northern Territories (or the Southern Kurils from Russia) are another disputed territory claimed by Japan. The Japanese and Russian Deputy Foreign Ministers will be meeting about the islands. There probably still won’t be a treaty, but there might at least be some progress. Protests, on the other hand, are less likely. My guess is that Noda and Putin would like to show strength and calm and are more interested in Vladivostok and Hokkaido in the context of a regional economy.

(When I was in Sapporo in January 2004, the lady in the bathhouse mistook me for a Russian. Her inadvertent remark to my wife – that there was a big, hairy Russian in the male bath – was wrong in only one particular. Everywhere else in Japan they think I’m American.)

Latest fill-up – 4.56l/100km

Fuel consumption settled on 4.56L/100 km.  Quite pleasing given the circumstances.

Pros: warmer weather, grill blocking (for the last 150 km) and generally smooth driving helped provide a reasonable result.

Cons: mornings are still very cold and my wife drove about a ¼ of the distance.  Her approach to acceleration is fairly brutal.  This is not always a bad thing, as it will charge the HV battery, which in turn can be used to help drive the vehicle.  However, her braking style doesn’t take advantage of regenerative braking.

Curiously, the HSI displayed 4.1l/100 km, which is wildly optimistic. The HSI error seems to have increased from 6.5% to 11.5%, but that might just be an anomaly.

Weirder is the Garmin ecorouteHD, which has gone from being a highly accurate FC meter to become even more Pollyanna.  It regularly shows trip FC of mid 3 litres or even in the 2’s when the true figure is about 25% more.  Only started happening after upgrading the Garmin firmware…

Grill blocking + DEFA EBH

A few weeks ago I fitted 3 lengths of pipe insulation to the lower grill (see previous post) however I hadn’t tried to test its effects.  I also hadn’t tried the EBH to see the maximum heating I could get from it.  Together, I saw something interesting.

The idea was to see the maximum temperature the block could reach at the maximum recommended time of 3 hours.  The ambient temperature in the garage was about 5°c at the time.  After 3 hours of warming, the coolant was at 45°c, an impressive result.

I started the car and made note of the coolant temp (45°c) and ambient temperature (10°c by this time).  The engine ran for a few seconds (40°c is the lowest temperature where the engine will start-stop).  The coolant temperature actually dropped from 45°c to 43°c in the first 300m.  But once I drove 750m the coolant was 58°c and about 1 km into the journey it was 68°c.  It would normally take me 3-4 km to reach 70°c, so that is a marked improvement.

Remember, the EBH is at the rear of the engine block whereas the coolant temperature sensor is near the thermostat housing at the front of the engine.  Coolant won’t circulate without the pump running, so the sensor was picking up warmth from the block and coolant by conduction mostly.

Why did it drop?  Coolant in the radiator would have been colder than coolant near the block.  As the first coolant pumped through the thermostat it would have been cooler than the coolant it replaced.

Why did it rise so quickly?  As the coolant circulated through the water jacket, it picked up the heat in the block.  This is its job, after all.  This spread the heat from the back of the block to reach the sensor at the front.

So, it also seems that the grill block is playing its part.  The coolant gets warmer and stays warmer because it isn’t being cooled by incoming air.

How hot was the engine block after 3 hours of pre-heating?  Hard to say without a non-contact thermometer and a bit of a reach.

(EDIT: My measurements were a bit short in the previous version.)